SNT Deutschland
44 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
07.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 2
07.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Chemnitz 3
06.04.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Satisfactory staff work. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Chemnitz 4
18.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. High payments. Average recognition. Excellent employer.
Chemnitz 5
06.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Essen 6
26.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Excellent employer.
Essen 7
11.12.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Essen 8
23.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. High payments. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 9
20.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Not recommendable employer.
Frankfurt a.M. 10
29.03.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Frankfurt a.M. 11
07.12.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Frankfurt a.M. 12
06.03.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Frankfurt a.M. 13
03.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Below-average salary. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Frankfurt a.M. 14
15.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Interesting tasks. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Greifswald 15
26.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. No filling operation. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 16
24.09.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 17
25.12.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 18
11.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Germany 19
31.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 20
06.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 21
05.04.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 22
27.08.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 23
19.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 24
09.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Germany 25
02.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 26
16.04.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 27
20.04.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Neubrandeburg 28
13.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Excellent employer.
Neubrandenburg 29
28.04.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Not recommendable employer.
Neubrandenburg 30
30.08.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Neubrandenburg 31
07.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Useful management. No filling operation. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Neubrandenburg 32
14.02.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Satisfactory employment site.
Potsdam 33
17.08.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Potsdam 34
06.05.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Potsdam 35
30.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Potsdam 36
31.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Beneficial career. Not recommendable employer.
Potsdam 37
23.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Potsdam 38
09.05.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Potsdam 39
13.11.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Filling employment. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Potsdam 40
24.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Potsdam 41
01.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Potsdam 42
23.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Potsdam 43
21.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Potsdam 44
04.06.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
